Religion, Spirituality and Life after Death

And they're good eating, too.
Re: Focusing on communication routes and means -- DWA Post Reply Top of the thread Forum
Posted by: crossbowman
06/18/2008, 19:29:30

Author Profile (About author)

Edit
Among the units used by the Nazis at Stalingrad was a Croat unit, the only non-German unit of any real quality on the German side of that engagement. They were good enough to be permitted to lead the initial assault on the city. It was an infantry regiment, roughly 5000 strong, but it carried about 3000 horses in its rosters, presumably to serve its supply unit, any indigenous artillery it carried, and of course the officers. The regiment might have had a battallion of horse-mobile infantry as well - this wasn't uncommon, because mobile infantry were useful for screening a regiment's withdrawal or for quickly reinforcing a battalion that found itself in trouble.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/369th_Reinforced_Infantry_Regiment

Towards the end, with little in the way of supplies to haul and nothing in the way of forage to feed them, it's likely that any horses that had not yet died from shelling or other causes were killed for food. That's one real advantage of horse over engine - in the final extreme, you can eat the thing.

More people of that era and region were familiar with the care and maintenance of horses than with the care of machinery, and it was easier to collect forage for horses from the surrounding region than to collect fuel for vehicles. Mechanized units - tanks, mechanized infantry - tended to rely on mechanized supply and artillery in order to keep pace with the tanks and half-tracks, but it wasn't uncommon for the slower units - foot infantry, artillery - to rely on the slower equine transport. (I differentiate here between a unit's indigenous artillery - typically smaller caliber pieces intended for use on the battlefield with the unit - and the larger artillery unit, which used the big-caliber guns and generally located itself well back from the fighting.)

"Robbins’s claim fails because the Hobbs Act does not apply when the National Government is the intended beneficiary of the allegedly extortionate acts."

WILKIE ET AL. v. ROBBINS. David H. Souter, Justice, U.S. Supreme Court
with John Roberts, Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy,
Clarence Thomas, Stephen Breyer, and Samuel Alito concurring.


Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert Where am i? Original Post Top of the thread Previous | Next | Current page
Followups

Religion, Spirituality and Life after Death