Re: Re: Rape OK, Assault OK ... but no dope
Re: Re: Rape OK, Assault OK ... but no dope -- skeptic-D	Post Reply		Forum

Posted by: cyanidefreak 07/07/2008, 10:31:30  (About author) Edit

Well, yeh. It inflames me that the Jeffs Cult gets away with rape, international child prostitution, and the assembly of God gets away with assault - in the name of religion. That you and the rest of America are not inflamed about it pisses me off even more. It must mean you condone those things yourself.

Post Reply | Email Friend | Alert

Previous | Next | Current page

Followups

Re: Re: Re: Rape OK, Assault OK ... but no dope --- skeptic-D ( 2008-07-07 18:06 ) ( 774 bytes ) +2   Pushed a button, did he? --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-07 22:37 ) ( 3898 bytes ) link +1 Religion, a lot of bull --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-08 18:05 ) ( 438 bytes ) Re: Re: Re: Re: Rape OK, Assault OK ... but no dope --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-08 13:57 ) ( 376 bytes ) +1   Or, legalise prostitution? --- DWA ( 2008-07-08 14:35 ) ( 693 bytes ) link +1 Re: Or, legalise prostitution? --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-09 11:42 ) ( 2228 bytes ) Getting away with?? --- crossbowman ( 2008-07-07 20:17 ) ( 410 bytes ) +1 Re: Getting away with?? --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-08 13:31 ) ( 1392 bytes ) +3 multiple --- DWA ( 2008-07-08 14:43 ) ( 1 bytes ) multiple --- DWA ( 2008-07-08 14:43 ) ( 1 bytes ) Ends versus means dilemma+add. --- DWA ( 2008-07-08 14:48 ) ( 524 bytes ) +2 Re: Ends versus means dilemma+add. --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-08 15:03 ) ( 379 bytes ) Re: Ends versus means dilemma+add. --- cyanidefreak ( 2008-07-14 18:38 ) ( 59 bytes ) +1 Inconsistency implies hypocricy, or just being naive? --- DWA ( 2008-07-15 10:30 ) ( 997 bytes )