(added)

This link below appears to be a post mortem, sort of an epitaph on the communist movement. "Clearly" the philosophical basis for communism has been out of reach of the average "worker" in their ?intelligently constructed artificial paradise.

For Skeptic Darrel: The connection with "religion" is that "communism" is atheistic. Since a big portion of the world has been schooled in and bought in to communism (now broadly rejected as a practical robust philosophy, case in point, mainland China) it seems potentially significant to any "scholar" of religion. What went wrong?

I happened across this link while preparing a post for TT Evo with a New Scientist article that reports that there may be some substance to Lamarckian theories of offspring inheriting parent-acquired traits, after all. The Soviet "commie" priesthood officially liked Lamarck, heheh.

In brief: There is at least *some* truth in what the "devil" says.

I would welcome some discussion and comments that help me understand what this web site publisher is really trying to say, or to avoid saying.

http://homepage.ntlworld.com/rosa.l/Anti-D_For_Dummies%2001.htm#Whats

Anti-Dialectics For Dummies

Introduction

"This Essay is meant to be a very brief, simplified and down-to-earth introduction to a few of the more important arguments against classical Dialectical Materialism [DM] found at my site. It is aimed solely at those who find the Basic Introductory Essay either too difficult or too long. Hence, I have deliberately tried to keep everything exceedingly basic and concise, saying all I want to (here) in less than 5000 words."